HighExistence is a community of conscious individuals centered around pondering, exploring & expanding this wondrous experience called life -- See the Mission »

Thinking Within Paradoxes

4521

I read a few years ago somewhere that a hallmark of a genius is being able to hold opposites together and transcend them. This stuck with me and over time I tried to make sense of it, because at first it was a very confusing concept. With some luck this concept began to make sense thanks to a random assortment of other things I read over the years following my discovery of this tidbit.

This train of thought has now become one of my favorite things to ponder. I feel it has taught me the dangers of holding onto apparent absolutes. Once you believe in something as an absolute, you are automatically precluding yourself from believing in the opposite, which means that in some ways a part of your freedom of thought as a human being is forfeited as a result. A good example of rising above these conventional kind of thoughts constructed with absolutes is the Wave-particle duality. I love this example because it is somewhat recent and shows the possible errors in absolutes and how they can prevent you from thinking “outside the box” so to speak.

Wave-particle duality is the concept that all matter and energy exhibits both wave-like and particle-like properties. Physicists argued for a long time whether light was a wave or a particle, and their insistence on their present beliefs prevented them from realizing the possibility that light could be both at the same time. While this is a very specific example, even using abstract thought experiments seems to work as well. Take these two opposites for example:

You are nothing. You are everything.

They both hold some truth and meaning. We can say you are everything because at any given point in time you are in contact with everything in the universe. It is impossible to escape both the tangible and intangible elements of the universe, they are constantly in contact with your being in a multitude of ways. A few examples are the atoms directly touching your skin as you sit, magnetic waves and invisible light waves from the sun passing through you, etc. Through this phenomena nothing can truly separate itself from all of existence. At the same time, we are nothing. Being part of everything in some ways means you are truly nothing as an individual. The idea that we are separate from the universe is more or less a really persistent delusion that we have somehow acquired. And even if we were separate…the amount of matter that you consist of in relative scope to what an infinite universe might contain is mathematically zero.

Now I’d like to tie this line of thinking into another one….the concept and realization of knowing nothing, yet knowing everything. The Way of the Samurai calls this the trackless road, where infinite secrets appear. Once we realize how truly we are lacking we only have everything to gain. Holding onto this thought can remove all sense of both pride and humility. Without knowing anything there is nothing to be proud of, and at the same time we no longer need to feel humiliated because we have come to terms with our shortcomings. Even while we know nothing, we can know everything because the truth of every situation exists in our being.

You know nothing, You know everything.

This is why always being open to being wrong can be so powerful. You create a dynamic persona that cannot show weakness because when you truly let go of yourself, you open yourself to the universe instilling you with the most powerful type of truth. You become a fluid force that adapts to everything and anything on a whim, because your ego and preconceptions don’t get in the way. Having an ego makes people fall hard, stops them from learning the errors of their ways and stops them from shifting the next constructively critical opportunity into a new, more powerful and improved version of their being. Being overly confident with your knowledge makes us vulnerable to clinging onto something false.

Bruce Lee believed this as a core part of his fighting philosophy. I love it because I think it applies far beyond martial arts: “Be formless… shapeless, like water. If you put water into a cup, it becomes the cup. You put water into a bottle; it becomes the bottle. You put it into a teapot; it becomes the teapot. Water can flow, or it can crash. Be water, my friend..”

Knowing nothing lets us flow into everything. I’ve been in martial arts just long enough to finally allow myself to know nothing, while simultaneously using everything I know. When someone throws an attack, a completely relaxed, open and trained mind will automatically show you the paths you can take to success, all you must do is let yourself flow through these paths. In this sense the only person you are overcoming is yourself. This is where the power of rising above opposites come into play. If we know nothing, we can know everything. Whatever true knowledge we have acquired already exists outside of our being, all we need to do is let it apply itself, let it fill the void like water. Such are many things in life, letting go of some of your beliefs can set you free and give you the ability to rise above the rest. “It’s only once you’ve lost everything that you are free to do anything” Tyler, Fight Club

Take your beliefs and preconceptions, consider the opposite. Hold them both, rise above them.

  • 161
Avatar of Peter Westermann

By

I am a student of the universe, visionary artist and founder of Threyda Art & Apparel. I am addicted to the power of thought, perspective and creative inspiration.

STAY UPDATED ON HIGH EXISTENCE

86 thoughts about Thinking Within Paradoxes

  1. I really liked the post, and i found it inspiring.

    Yet there is one thing that i would like to share.. a perspective that i have thought about that maybe offers a different way to look at this.Im not trying to “transcend” the other arguments but just add a way of thinking that i couldn’t find in the other comments.

    First of all let me say that i really sympathize with these perspectives and i have and keep on struggling with these issues myself in my everyday life.

    The chain of thought:
    I started my life as a religious person believing in absolute truths.. later i became a “relativist” believing in the words of Protagoras who said “man is the measure of all things” and thus could no longer believe in any absolutes as we humans shape all. This relativist position was something i found to be very fluid. Never settling on an issue, always criticizing my believes and engaging in tireless discussions with others who did believe in some form of truth.

    Later i found that what i had to do was to take a pragmatic stance and build temporary platforms from which i could act, while saying to myself that “this platform that i just built is a temporary construction and as soon as i gain more insight i will have to move to another one”. the key for me was to work with whatever i had at the time, not criticizing what i had done before because i knew not then what i knew later.

    This was my position until recently when i apparently am beginning to “return to my roots”

    Let me explain:

    What if this “seeing both sides and then transcend above it” is based on an assumption that we as individuals should balance contradictions within ourself, call it individualism if you like, and that this perspective let us loose track of another way of seeing, namely us as part of a collective? and how we as a collective can do the same together?

    “a weapon doesnt question who he kills or why, that isnt the point of weapons”
    - Loken in Horus Rising, warhammer 40.000-

    Let me explain..

    ..using the metaphor of “fluid” and “water” from your post.. You quoted Lee and said:

    “Be formless… shapeless, like water. If you put water into a cup, it becomes the cup. You put water into a bottle; it becomes the bottle.

    But this practice relies on other objects not to be fluid like water.. water has no shape without other things.. if you put water in water it becomes notting but water..
    Therefore from a “collective” way of thinking of things.. A person who becomes a cup, being immobile and functioning only for the purpose of other to use as a container of liquid has sacrificed the possibility of ever becoming water. But at the same time this person, by doing this,has given his life to the collective and thus has helped enable millions of actions by others.. it becomes one object among millions that makes us as a human collective function at a “higher order”. with a cup you can drink if thirsty, smash it against the wall to show your anger, paint it to show your individualism, give it as a gift to show your love to another.. in short the cup enables YOU to be all these differnt things which you could never be without it…

    Water on the other hand is without form and substance.. until it comes into contact with other “objects” that gives it its temporary shape. If every human being became like water we as species would disintegrate into a shapeless mass (or ocean) of people.. Thus a person who strives to become water, in one way,is lives as a “parasite” on other people who have chosen a particular shape(for the greater good of others?), while not thanking these people but instead criticizing them for their immobility and stressing that others should also be as fluid.

    So to sum up.. if we se us humans as a collective.. we need a little bit of everything, including water to makes the wheels go round, but without the other things water has no shape.

    Thus for myself, i am paradoxally slowly returning to my “roots” as a kid, when i believed in “hard” truths and principles.. not because im sure that they are “true”, but because to have a belief, a position and something to fight for also helps to give shape to others who oppose my believes and fight against them. Therefore my rigid position enables the positioning of others in relation to me.

    As for this comment, i could like to thank you because it would not have been possible to make without the form, shape and substance of the article that im comment on. In this sense you enabled me to create this response:-)

    • Chris said on 05.24.2013

      wow…. I have really been struggling with this water thing, ’cause apparently deep down I’m fighting for something to believe in while i consciously question everything i do believe in (which is not very much). Resulting in a very confused me. your train of thought not only perfectly describes me and my life but is also causing me to rethink how i once perceived this choice. To be a cup or to be water. I’ve always seen water as being a better choice than a cup and maybe that is a result of “the grass on the other side” effect but either way, you’ve helped me realize the two are on equal ground and i should choose to my heart’s own contentment. Thank you both Uttcore and Peter Westerman. :)

    • Kyle said on 06.14.2013

      It depends on how you take the water thing I suppose. To me it’s a metaphor for pure potential energy, which does not hesitate when it becomes time to go into motion. I also don’t have a problem with the analogy of only maintain a temporary state only because all states are only temporary by nature of impermanence.

      Also when someone truly embraces that sort of nature, the idea is to be not judging and analyzing all of the incoming information but rather observing and accepting it, and going with it. To criticize or judge others is to show a missing of the point, as it were, for the water (energy) simply IS. With the water metaphor referring to people being fluid, the water in a cup does not convince the water in a pot that cups are clearly far better and they should be transferred. A good example would be two zen Buddhists arguing over who’s humbler and more enlightened than the other.

      Either way you are right about needing a more concrete thing. ‘All paths lead to the top of the mountain’ sooner or later anyhow. I find that it was easier once realizing this state of the universe, that having some way of honoring the divine that was more concrete was necessary. So I also returned ‘to my roots’ in a way. Labels and terms make it possible for people to try and get a feel where they stand in relation to you, absolutely. Otherwise all you have are these powerfully abstract theories and revelations that you dont have the ability to convey easily or at least not to do so and be understood well.

      It is interesting to note that in many places, from Eastern philosophy to some pagan practices the ‘journey back home’ is repeated. In fact the Runes of Norse heathenism represent a personal journey, from the simple things in life, to awakening to what is outside of oneself, to the journey within and self-realization, and finally to returning back home with a different outlook and feel.

  2. True or False? This statement is False.

Leave a reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.