Censoring the internet?
Homepage › Forums › Global Awareness › Censoring the internet?
| Lee
(@mindlessfreak30)
1 year, 6 months ago ago
http://www.tumblr.com/protect-the-net |
|
| Frälsaren
(@manimal)
1 year, 6 months ago ago
Censoring the net doesn’t work. There are always ways to get around it, especially in such technologically advanced countries, where there are so many computer-savy people. The governments aren’t very smart at all and their internet tools aren’t very safe. Like the wikileaks stuff, all the hackers did was hijack a tor-node. That’s really easy. The governments don’t know this kind of shit very well, and there are many random people who do know it very well. Besides, it’s just the internet. |
|
| Ka
(@kaciula)
1 year, 6 months ago ago
Censoring the net does work. Of course there are ways to get around it but only for people who know stuff. The average person doesn’t even know that he/she is censored. Blacklisting domain names is serious shit. You’ll have to go with a static IP or if it’s dynamic, do more complicated stuff. And already 99% of the people don’t bother. So, yeah, protect the Internet. It’s spreading knowledge every second. |
|
| Lee
(@mindlessfreak30)
1 year, 6 months ago ago
Seems to be getting more attention… http://www.break.com/index/the-government-wants-to-kill-the-internet-2222109 |
|
|
| Anonymous
fml, I had such high hopes for the internet |
| luigi
(@luigiblue)
1 year, 6 months ago ago
It’s the end of the world as we know it ;) |
|
| Frälsaren
(@manimal)
1 year, 6 months ago ago
They’re bringing about their own doom. Finally. That’s the best part about manipulation, that whatever you strive for will eventually lead to the demise of it. Deception is self-destruction, and they even know it but they don’t care. This type of people always end up causing their own death. People will not accept this. I know it. This is war. |
|
| Ray Butler
Yeah, because sites like this (namely me) are bagging the shit out of Rupert Murdoch, multi-national corporate take overs and calling the republicans on the political agenda of fear campaigns in the media, of course they want to censor us:) |
|
| Frälsaren
(@manimal)
1 year, 6 months ago ago
@Ray The republicans, you say? The democrats are doing it just as much. And most political parties in other countries as well. |
|
| Ray Butler
I don’t know, the Republicans benefit more when the nation is in fear because scared people are more likely to vote Republican. This is simply because of examples like the 2 Bush presidents and Nixon, they were hard as nuclear nails, but Obama, Clinton and other Democrats are more lovers than fighters. |
|
| Frälsaren
(@manimal)
1 year, 6 months ago ago
@Ray Errr… there was war during Clinton’s time, and there is war now under Obama. And people wouldn’t vote for either party if they didn’t vote out of fear. |
|
| Ray Butler
There’s pretty much always a war going on. After 9/11 Bush was re-elected because they knew a democrat wasn’t bad ass enough to take down Bin Laden, Americans were shit scared of an at large Bin Laden. The Republicans knew they were scared and knew they would most likely vote for the Republicans as long as Bin Laden was still out there. |
|
| Frälsaren
(@manimal)
1 year, 6 months ago ago
@Ray That wasn’t against the plan, it was according to the plan. I just pointed the wars out because you said Nixon and the Bushes (rad band name?) were hardasses and Clinton and Obama being loving, caring people. It isn’t true. Also, war IS fear. |
|
| Ray Butler
Ok, I will agree that the Democrats also use fear, but it is a different fear to what the Republicans use. eg: Back in 2006 the Democrats spear headed a climate change fear campaign. This was seeking to get action on the issue. Now, climate change is a valid threat, something we should fear, but few people do fear it. |
|
| Flynnstone
(@flynnstone)
1 year, 6 months ago ago
@Ray speaking as an american who has paid attention to the past three election cycles (I was a bit young for Clinton), I think that we were just as scared about the economic recession on the tail end of W.’s second term as we were about war when any of the recent Republicans were elected. People were scared they were going to lose their homes, jobs, etc. and Obama, as a non-incumbent and a Democrat, offered them an alternative. Now, with the 2012 election coming up, many aren’t satisfied with Obama and are less likely to vote for him now, hence the Tea Party Movement, which can claim legitimacy because many of the same problems from 2008, while better, are not entirely fixed (as if they expect a recession to be cured overnight) and offer a radical alternative to the Democratic platform. |
|
| Frälsaren
(@manimal)
1 year, 6 months ago ago
@Ray You’ve got it all wrong. This 1% isn’t affiliated with the republicans, they own both the republicans and the democrats. They’re no different, just different names for the same shit. And the climate change stuff is another one of their distraction maneuvers. When you state believe things like the ones you stated above, you’re basically letting them sway you just the way they planned. Anyway, this stuff is way off topic. If there is more to discuss on our little side-subject let’s discuss it over pm. |
|
| Ka
(@kaciula)
1 year, 6 months ago ago
@Amarelias, Install Adblock Plus extension/add-on in your favorite browser and your ads will suddenly disappear ;) Whenever I am at someone else’s computer, I can’t believe how that person can surf the net with all the ads screaming at him. However, the video ads still persist. There needs to be a solution for this also. |
|
| Frälsaren
(@manimal)
1 year, 6 months ago ago
@Ka Adblock is a necessity for any internet user. I haven’t seen an ad in many years, and I can’t believe people put up with that shit. Video adds can be dealt with the same way. There’s an addon for adblock that does this, and there are many different flashblock extensions. |
|
| Ray Butler
Well, I agree with you Caitlan, that the situation of the world and it’s politics can not be summed up in a couple of paragraphs as I did, there is much more to it, many more factors that I have omited. |
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.



