|
| Rob Goughnour
http://news.yahoo.com/monolith-object-mars-could-call-214004772.html
|
|
| Dick
Thanks for the update…
|
|
| R.V. Star
my god…..
|
|
| Ellie
Here is your “monolith”:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/__e2VLp6gwyk/SmgwVJxjkbI/AAAAAAAAEa4/oWV358v8quY/s400/Phobos+monolith.jpg
|
|
| Anonymous
technically, yes, it is a monolith. Monolith means one stone. But that doesn’t make it anything special, they’re everywhere.
|
|
| IJC
My GOD, MAN!
http://www.emporia.edu/earthsci/garden/rock06.jpg
|
|
| Jay
@IJesusChrist, hahah
|
|
| Matthew
Once this monolith turns into not just a rock, I think my interest will peak a little.
|
|
| Sean D Stevens
I’m not all that impressed. After all, we have the Japanese Underwater Pyramid on Earth, so why can’t Mars have their own unique structure made through erosion.
http://rabbithole2.com/presentation/images2/artifacts/japan4.jpg
‘http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/09/070919-sunken-city.html
This reminds me of an argument I made a while back on a topic I can’t really remember. We’re all familiar with the phrase form follows function, but what about the opposite: function follows form. That is, we see the form of a clean jutting piece of rock and assume that it must have a function based on our wild imaginations.
|
|
| Anonymous
stuff like this all over
http://webecoist.momtastic.com/2009/07/22/18-natural-formations-that-look-man-made/
|
Anonymous
Anonymous
