Monolith on Mars

3 years, 2 months ago
1
Profile photo of Dick Dick (360) (@dick) 3 years, 2 months ago ago

Thanks for the update…

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of R.V. Star R.V. Star (147) (@rickvonstar) 3 years, 2 months ago ago

my god…..

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of  Anonymous (194) (@) 3 years, 2 months ago ago

technically, yes, it is a monolith. Monolith means one stone. But that doesn’t make it anything special, they’re everywhere.

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of  Anonymous (2812) (@) 3 years, 2 months ago ago
[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of Jay Jay (87) (@jaygran7) 3 years, 2 months ago ago

@IJesusChrist, hahah

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of Matthew Matthew (1123) (@ojai) 3 years, 2 months ago ago

Once this monolith turns into not just a rock, I think my interest will peak a little.

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of Sean D Stevens Sean D Stevens (154) (@thelaughingfool) 3 years, 2 months ago ago

I’m not all that impressed. After all, we have the Japanese Underwater Pyramid on Earth, so why can’t Mars have their own unique structure made through erosion.
http://rabbithole2.com/presentation/images2/artifacts/japan4.jpg
‘http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/09/070919-sunken-city.html
This reminds me of an argument I made a while back on a topic I can’t really remember. We’re all familiar with the phrase form follows function, but what about the opposite: function follows form. That is, we see the form of a clean jutting piece of rock and assume that it must have a function based on our wild imaginations.

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of  Anonymous (194) (@) 3 years, 2 months ago ago
[Hidden]