Nothing is Better

2 years, 9 months ago

There is no such thing as “better”

Nothing can be better than anything else.

Hypothetically: You have two bikes, one is brand new, shiny, works like a charm. The other is rusty and old, the tire is popped and the handlebars are falling off. One works, one doesn’t. But does that make one better than the other. Both are just being, they are both there.

This can be applied to anything. I especially like it applied to people and appearances. One persona has clear skin, tall and slender, athletic. The other is short and gross. One isn’t better than the other. They are both existing and they both do what they do.

Do you think this point of view is sustainable? Could one actually implement it into their life and view EVERYTHING as equal?

Why are living things better than non-living things? They’re not. Because there is no such thing as better.

Thoughts?

June 5, 2012 at 9:56 pm

You must sign in or join to reply!

1
Profile photo of DaJetPlane DaJetPlane M (@lytning91) 2 years, 9 months ago ago

@calypso, yes.

I mentioned this in a more generalized way a while ago in a discussion entitled “uniqueness,” wherein I discussed the fact that every single thing, action, etc is unique every time, from the breathes that you breathe to the time it takes you to blink; it just depends on the scale of measure. If you get to a small enough fraction of time, mass, whatever…there is a change.

Everything in the entire world is, as they say, “apples and oranges.”

Glad to see that other people are discussing this in their heads

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of Callisto Callisto (@calypso) 2 years, 9 months ago ago

@lytning91, I really like that. Everything is unique. I’m going to mull on that one, thanks.

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of DaJetPlane DaJetPlane M (@lytning91) 2 years, 9 months ago ago

@calypso, as will I incorporate your philosophy. Awesomeness level has increased +1 =)

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of SomewhatRelative SomewhatRelative (@setu) 2 years, 9 months ago ago

It is what it is. Think this through a little more;

Nothing is equal if nothing is better or worse. Equal is a comparison just as better or worse is, they’re used based on context. Something is better or worse *if* you compare it. If there is no situation behind the perspective requiring these comparisons, then there is no reason to label things as better or worse.

Rephrased:
If there is no such thing as better, then there is no such thing as equal(or worse in this case) either. Either you compare them or you don’t. Everything isn’t equal if equal doesn’t exist. But because nothing is equal it doesn’t mean that somethings better or worse than anything else.

Also if something is unique it’s not equal to anything else.

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of DaJetPlane DaJetPlane M (@lytning91) 2 years, 9 months ago ago

@setu, not equality in this instance is used to signify a lack of measure, not to say something is measured as equal.

It’s like saying something is neutral. Neutral isn’t an opinion. Neutrality isn’t a part of the system just like 0 isn’t a number.

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of SomewhatRelative SomewhatRelative (@setu) 2 years, 9 months ago ago

@lytning91
Equality is being used wrong if it’s intended to signify a lack of measure. Neutral is definitely the word you’re looking for though ;)

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of DaJetPlane DaJetPlane M (@lytning91) 2 years, 9 months ago ago

@setu, What about this definition?

“Uniform in application or effect; without discrimination on any grounds”

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of pat pat (@epath) 2 years, 9 months ago ago

Hmmm…no, I cannot agree exactly. I mean, you might say that one thing is not better, but people are certainly treated differently if they are considered ugly or attractive. Although it would be “better” to have a philosophical attitude that all is equal. However, you can’t really say starving is better than being able to eat. I guess I am not a true Buddhist.

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of SomewhatRelative SomewhatRelative (@setu) 2 years, 9 months ago ago

@lytning91, since the application of the bikes in this context are nothing but existing, you’re right, they would be equal. My statement about equality not existing without things being better or worse was nonsense, lol. But calling them equal is still measuring them, because you are comparing the two.

Sorry for my lack of thinking in my above posts.

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of SomewhatRelative SomewhatRelative (@setu) 2 years, 9 months ago ago

Soo… reviewing everything… the statement here is that nothing is better than anything else at existing. Do I have that right?
This pov is sustainable only if the person chooses not to have opinions on things I guess.

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of Eric Eric M (@blankey) 2 years, 9 months ago ago

Yup. Same goes for “normal”. Nothing is normal. In one culture make-up for women could be normal, in another it isn’t.

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of pat pat (@epath) 2 years, 9 months ago ago

@shaniquaaa, I disagree. Face paint has been used for centuries, maybe millenia, for both men and women. It may not be “natural,” but it is the norm.

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of  Anonymous (@) 2 years, 9 months ago ago

@calypso, I love what you’re saying. As far as people and other beings are concerned I completely agree. Don’t know if I feel the same about intimate objects, but it’s something to think about, so thanks for that.

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of DaJetPlane DaJetPlane M (@lytning91) 2 years, 9 months ago ago

@setu, yeah he is saying that existence in itself is all there is, and so if there is more than one object in the discussion, they can only be compared by saying they both are themselves uniquely. They cannot be a lesser or greater form of one another, because both are unique and therefore unable to correctly be compared.

@epath, your view is based in reality, not in abstract actuality. On a grand scale, our biases will never let us truly believe a philosophy as pure as the one described by @calypso, but nonetheless his idea is far more compatible with what the universe is than our own, relative opinions.

Any form of comparison (normal, better, worse, richer, poorer, etc) would be eliminated in an ideal world. All would be one and one would be all. In fact, such a belief exists that we are in fact one and all, all and one…only our human condition does not allow us to really SEE the forest through the trees, so to speak.

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of Ray Butler Ray Butler M (@trek79) 2 years, 9 months ago ago

Nihilism.
Value systems are artificial, true, but if you like something and the alternative is something that you have never experienced before, you can explore or you can stick with what works. In the idea that, for example, there is no reasonable way to asert that life is superior to death, this is true, but I enjoy life and am unfamiliar with death, a thing that will come eventually, so why wouldn’t I believe it is currently better to live then role the dice on uncertainty?

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of Sasho Stoyanov Anonymous (@) 2 years, 9 months ago ago

You can have two bottles, one half empty and one half full, and you can also have two trucks – one filled with half-empty bottles and one filled with half-full bottles. But the trucks are far away from you, have no fuel and the drivers are idiots!

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of The_truth_is_ The_truth_is_ (@sirensetmefree) 2 years, 9 months ago ago

@calypso, I like this proposition, but I think there’s a problem with semantics here.

I can imagine this situation: “You have two bikes, one is brand new, shiny, works like a charm. The other is rusty and old, the tire is popped and the handlebars are falling off. One works, one doesn’t.” I am looking for one to get me from point A to point B. My measurement for what is “better” or “worse” is no longer based on the quality of existence of an object, but rather, it’s effectiveness in the use that I want to attribute to it. In that scenario, then, I can say that, if Bike B cannot get me to point B from point A, but Bike A could, then I would have to say that Bike A is better, giving my needs.

Now, let’s take this a bit further. Let’s put this out of my personal desire, and into effectiveness at purpose as a whole. For what purpose was the bike created? For what reasonable purposes can these bikes be purchased? It seems to me as though if you present these purposes and determine that one bike is “better” than the other the majority of the time, if not just overwhelmingly so, then you would have to answer as to WHY that is. Inference to the best explanation (abductive reasoning) would suggest that Bike A is, simply put, better.

I understand that there can be things that Bike B has proven to be better for (for example, nostalgia because it looks like a bike you once owned, where as Bike A doesn’t). But then that seems to me like having a six sided die where 5 out of the 6 sides say A and 1 says B and saying that neither is better to bet on because they “exist.”

I think…

[Hidden]
1

Some shit is clearly better than other shit.

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of DaJetPlane DaJetPlane M (@lytning91) 2 years, 9 months ago ago

@sirensetmefree, Your addition changes the argument. It is simply saying that one object’s existence is no better than another. You created a relative condition which alters the argument, which would then allow for @calypso to adjust the argument accordingly.

As it was intended though it is only meant to say that, as two different objects, you cannot compare one to another and say one is better: it is only when you create an arbitrary condition to “satisfy” that you perceive a better or worse view of something.

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of Callisto Callisto (@calypso) 2 years, 9 months ago ago

@sirensetmefree, I see what you are saying. But why is getting from point A to point B “better” than not getting there? The focus of this philosophy is that nothing is better than anything else. Everything just exists. You could get where you are going, or you couldn’t. Also, I think @lytning91 is better at explaining this than I am, but we seem to be on the same page.

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of DaJetPlane DaJetPlane M (@lytning91) 2 years, 9 months ago ago

@calypso, you are the one the created the topic so I don’t think you should forego your credit in the discussion for my annotations.

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of The_truth_is_ The_truth_is_ (@sirensetmefree) 2 years, 9 months ago ago

@lytning91,

Hmm… I guess I misread it. But if that’s the argument, then it’s not really an argument. It’s comparing the same quality in both and saying they are the same, in regards to that quality. In this case, the quality is existing. It would be like opening up two instances of Microsoft Paint, using the same type of Red to fill in the default empty box, and saying that neither of them is better at “red.” Well, that’s not really an argument. It’s a shard quality that has an equal definition.

Everything that exists, fully exists. There is no such thing as “half-existing,” so then it is a shared quality. It is as interesting as pointing out that everything is made up of atoms. Or that all atoms are 99% empty space.

Unless I’m misinterpreting something again.

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of The_truth_is_ The_truth_is_ (@sirensetmefree) 2 years, 9 months ago ago

@calypso,

“Everything just exists.” I guess this is where my problem would lie. I just don’t agree that things solely exist. I agree that everything DOES exist, but I would argue that there is more to be said about what comes with existing (other qualities) that help determine “better” or “worse.” I mean, it’s hard to say that something that exists does not have properties other than existing.

Also, read @lytning91, “I don’t think you should forego your credit in the discussion for my annotations.”

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of DaJetPlane DaJetPlane M (@lytning91) 2 years, 9 months ago ago

@sirensetmefree, yeah I think you get the gist of it, aside from the half-existing thing. He is not saying that everything that exists, exists. What he is saying is that everything that exists, exists as an individual. There is no true way to compare two existing items because it is, as they say, like comparing apples and oranges. He sees the apples and oranges statement for every, single thing. You are coming in with the human perspective of relativity…relative…relate.

Our minds are made such that we can only function through relatedness. We do not have brains with enough power to truly process and live by the idea uttered from @calypso. Your argument rests on what we perceive, his arguments rests on predicting what actaully IS.

And it is an argument, in that people don’t necessarily believe what he said, but in general, it is more of a statement of epiphany imo.

Like, he is wrapping his head around an idea in a way that touches him more personally than saying that everything has atoms. Everything is anything, and anything is everything is a much more eloquent and sentimental than

[Hidden]
1
Profile photo of  Anonymous (@) 2 years, 9 months ago ago

This started out from a nihilistic viewpoint but others seem to have taken it a different direction where you can’t compare things. Of course you can, take dogs and cats, cats suck and dogs are awesome, they’re very different but I compare them and I choose dogs to be better. The point of nihilism is to say that nothing holds any intrinsic value, so any value placed on an action or object is purely subjective. This absence of intrinsic value means that everything truly is just existing, any meaning or value is only so because we put it there.

Take the bike example, one functional and one broken, someone who needs to get from A to B would say that the functional bike is better, I’m personally not a fan of biking, I’d say screw em both, somebody who enjoys fixing up broken bicycles might say that the broken one is better for his interests. Some people might say that killing is always bad, others might say it’s ok in self defense, others might be brought up in a way that tells them it is ok to further their desires. But how can anyone say that any view is better or worse? They can’t be right or wrong, their subjective interpretation can only clash with yours.

Unless I missed the OPs original point and he actually was talking about how everything is unique and therefor not subject to comparison, in which case I disagree.

[Hidden]
Reply to this topic
Click here to join the our site-wide 30 Day Dream Journaling Challenge! Challenge Yourself

More Posts Like This

2

Profile photo of Campfirecowboy Where do you go?

When you die, where do you go? I mean sure you no longer interact with that which is (depending on your perspective)…but where do “you” go. Is it possible for you to escape the cosmos…and if yes...

11
1

Profile photo of Jacky Jobar Happiness?

Is nirvana remotely possible for human beings? I’ve often been thinking about how happiness can become an everyday thing… and most of the time, it seems utterly impossible. How can someone be ultimately...

5
1

Profile photo of Anil kumar I'm not satisfied with me

I am not so satisfied with me, my parents, Well wishers , friends all are the best one i got but only things here in my life i am not able to digest is its me. i am not getting any idea of what to do next...

0
3

Profile photo of anonymous poster Sexual/Emotional Chemistry – Why is this so hard to find?

So prior to meeting someone in person I had already developed an immediate connection with them online. It was 2 hours of back and forth jibber jabber (nothing serious, just friendly discussion as if we have been friends...

6
5

Profile photo of wolfman What do you Fear?

As I was reading posts and responding to them I decided I wanted to get some input from you all on a topic that I toil over quite often. Everywhere I look I see things like “conquer your fears”, “fear...

35
3

Profile photo of Viura Al-Burj Interesting things to learn about

What are some things that you find interesting reading/learning about? For me i’ve started to really get into physics etc. Post suggestions :) Suggestions: Nikola Tesla Issac Newton ( such a brilliant mind!)...

20
1

Profile photo of JustinDanger The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong

Every single individual atom is alive with a unique consciousness Your mind is the ruler of these atoms, whatever you think attracts certain atoms with a similar vibration and motivates them to carry on life processes...

23
1

Profile photo of sian Book Slop

Introduction We have trouble telling the truth on a number of occasions, and resisting the arrest of our lies has become increasingly difficult over the years. It’s become taboo to speak our minds, and it’s become...

4
48

Profile photo of M4G1C LOG1C14N [HE 30 Day Challenge] March ’15 – Dream Journaling!

Is everyone super zen from last month’s meditation challenge? I hope so :) The challenge for March is dream journaling! Dream journaling is the practice of writing down your dreams immediately upon waking (before...

111
4

Profile photo of isthisreal Traveling on a budget?

I’m a broke ass college student but I NEED to leave this city this summer. Maybe pack up the car or save up enough for a one way ticket? Anybody else feeling restless? Any tips on how to travel VERY cheap? thanks...

1
2

Profile photo of LVX Quotes

Genius seeks continuously, comprehends thoroughly, contemplates passionately, and then disagrees entirely.

1
3

Profile photo of LVX The KABALAH!

Since all the threads I have found on this subject are old, I felt the need to make a fresh one dedicated to this most awesome system of ‘Life’ study. Those who wonder what it is, please ask, and those who...

79
2

Profile photo of LVX Does everything we do ripple across the universe?

I often wonder if through all the song lyrics and every passage in a book that seems to transforms into a voice sitting infront of me, staring me in the eyes, and talking to me alone in the world, I wonder if that voice...

1
1

Profile photo of LVX Lucid dreaming books

Anybody have any suggestions for a lucid dreaming book for a beginner?

1
1

Profile photo of LVX Ever spent hours trying to find something do?

I usually am a very decisive person. Though I occasionally find it very difficult to find an activity that suits my interests when I’m in the mood of doing something fun. I recently discovered a very good app for...

4