Should media be regulated?
Homepage › Forums › Epiphanies & Ideas › Should media be regulated?
| Legal Mascot
(@vallari)
1 year, 3 months ago ago
Much has been said and done on the issue of media regulation. Concerns start from the point of piracy, copyright violations to unsafe and unsuitable data for kids, child pornography etc. Without going into the details, I would like to know what’s your countries stand on media regulation and to what extent is it regulated? Should internet also come under the ambit of the so-called government regulation, or should it be self-regulatory? With the internet being flooded with more and more bloggers trying to put forth their opinions, should any body (statutory or otherwise) interfere just to make sure that the content being displayed is safe for the audience to view, or is this idea a total ridicule? What’s your stand? |
|
| 1.61803399
(@drunkmonkmeth)
1 year, 3 months ago ago
no |
|
| Josh
(@yoshknows)
1 year, 3 months ago ago
The only regulation the media should be held accountable to and the only ethical bound they have in my eyes is to not make slanderous statements or proclimations, or to even insinuate a claim that is obviously slanderous. This seems obvious to me, and not to mention that they should be stating the facts of the scenario based on the most reliable information they’ve obtained, unobjectively they should report findings, and be unrestricted in any fashion… And just to clarify, I do think there is a difference between opinion and slander…”He gives me the vibe of a child molester.” = Your opinion. “He’s a child molester!” = Slander, unless he’s been convicted in a court of law, or you caught him in the act. |
|
| Sasho Stoyanov
I am fascinated by some twisted news and no one can really say who the fuck told the reporters to say specific things. Some shit doesn’t help anybody. Some twisted shit makes it worse. Internet though… it’s impossible to think of a sentence with the words government and internet in it. The internet is legion. Probably the biggest government with the biggest army on the planet. The biggest bullshit of all is that the medias love reality shows and they are going way too far with their power. Piracy is old news. If it was 10-15 years ago it would be real piracy. Now – we listen more to music on youtube, facebook, anywhere, instead of just collecting our music. Today’s music is mostly shit. Yep. I don’t know who still calls this piracy. Some greedy bastards who are full of shit for sure. :) But think about it. If no one talks about those things, why were they put there to work in the first place? They won’t have shit to do, which means no salary. I think it’s a huge circle of bullshit in a loop and it’s doing a great job at it. Just put cameras everywhere! I don’t know much about bloggers since I don’t read every douche that was born. |
|
| alive
i think the only way the media should be regulated is in its consistent and increasing use of women’s bodies as marketing strategies. i think it should find another way to sell products–from cars to insurance to food–other than exploiting the bodies of women. but i’m sure that’s not what you mean by regulating. |
|
| Sasho Stoyanov
@Ren Women want that. You must change women if you want such kind of change. |
|
| Josh
(@yoshknows)
1 year, 3 months ago ago
@ Ren, you are speaking more of marketing/advertising, not the media. But I agree with everything you said, but this has worked for an eon, and they aren’t going to get off that train anytime soon. By regulation, he’s hinting on the variable of controlling the media, and if you need proof that control is prevelant, look no further than any cable news network’s daily contents vs. all the horrible things that are ignored. Unfortunately, most of the “media” in the world are comprised of paprazzi, gossip columnists, sports analysts, and opinion columnists, not reporters who are unbiased, uncontrolled and impartial. |
|
| alive
women want to be exploited? i think the only reason any woman would want that is because that has been shown as the only definition of ‘success’ for a woman. if you look good, you’ve succeeded. media companies want that. they take a certain standard (tall, thin, flawless and fair skin, traditionally blond hair) and make it the standard all women strive for. and they tell you it’s possible just by purchasing these weight loss packages, or this make up, or going to this gym. it’s capitalism that fuels this vicious cycle and the only way to change women is to change the system that knocks them down daily. |
|
| alive
@josh, yea i understand the question. but when i hear the word ‘media’ my brain goes nuts. hahah |
|
| Ray Butler
If I say “Hitler was a great guy” clearly people will try to censor it, you let censorship get its foot in the door, any opinion is at risk, ridiculous or not. Everything on the net is 2 dimensional, it is not harming anyone, people in the 3 dimensional reality are harming people, you stop them you do not stop megabytes. The fact is that the internet is a source for finding people who harm people and if people stop leaving papertrails by way of internet it becomes much more difficult to find and stop them. |
|
| Sasho Stoyanov
People need to have something to hate. They can’t be united if they can’t hate something passionately in a group. That’s how it works. That’s the answer to almost every social opinion. That’s how we make friends. If you’re neutral, then you’ll be isolated and alone. Why was/is wikileaks an independent collective of journalists? Because of the constant censorship we deal with every day. |
|
| Sasho Stoyanov
But it makes me sad of what MTV is today. I can’t even explain my sadness. It’s total crap! |
|
| Legal Mascot
(@vallari)
1 year, 3 months ago ago
I see that majority of the people are against such regulation. Regulation is not subjective anymore with the legislation of many countries seriously planning on making laws on it. Copyright laws and such anti-piracy laws remain, but the problem arises when a bunch of government people want to decide what the public must view. For example, what happened in the Julian Assange case, all the links were taken down immediately. Why? Does the public not have the right to know the truth, specially in all the democratic countries! I wonder. |
|
| Alec
No, never. At least not by a governing body. It sets a really bad precedent. |
|
| Alex
(@hollowinfinity)
1 year, 3 months ago ago
Nothing should ever be censored. Ever. |
|
| BirdFlyingHigh
(@birdflyinghigh)
1 year, 3 months ago ago
@Sasho “The media gives them what they want to see” I don’t recall any television network ever sending me a survey of how I would like my media to be. THEY want to mold ME into something they can sell products to – they are not a reflection of my wants or desires. Just because the current model of media exploits the sexuality of women to sell products doesn’t mean that this is the way it has to be. Couldn’t we have mass media that didn’t assume its consumer was a heterosexual male with nymphomaniacal tendencies? Sexuality is most powerful when it is personal, but the portrayal of women in the media like Ren is talking about depersonalizes the sexuality of women; it turns their sexuality into a one-size-fits-all product. That’s why I boycott the shit out of most traditional media. |
|
| Alex
(@hollowinfinity)
1 year, 3 months ago ago
Anyone that has a facebook knows that girls sexualize themselves. Guys just enjoy it. |
|
| Eric
(@blankey)
1 year, 3 months ago ago
Possibly to focus more on the positives in the world? Besides that, no. |
|
| Sasho Stoyanov
@FishInTheSea you know how I feel. Men are stupid. |
|
| alive
@Alex, yea, girls sexualize themselves. because that’s what they’re conditioned by society to do. we’re told to be ridiculously experienced sexbots and at the same time ‘virginal.’ we aren’t allowed to take control of our own sex lives without being called whores. there’s this deep contradiction in our values that tell us that women’s bodies are supposed to be readily available for entertainment and use, but women are supposed to be innocent and pure at the same time. it’s bullshit and if you don’t see what’s going on, you’re blind. |
|
| Sasho Stoyanov
@Ren This shit reminds me of a dumb girl I once knew. She was upset when guys looked at her ass, because it was too perversive and when no one looked at her, she thought she was ugly. Oh, yeah. There’s no contradiction here. Just pure stupidity. |
|
| Alex
(@hollowinfinity)
1 year, 3 months ago ago
@Ren, I understand what you are saying, and I agree. The thing is though is that we create society. Society doesn’t create us. We need to grow out of this, and I can see from other guys my age, that the majority of people are starting to find these sexualized girls unattractive..at least when it comes to the real world. Porn is pretty impersonal if you ask me. If we teach our kids good morals, we can grow out of this. |
|
| Lou
(@loumarco)
1 year, 3 months ago ago
The American media is already heavily regulated. Of course, with laws now passed, one could view a media organ being critical, say, of the upcoming war with Iran as ‘aiding and abetting terrorists’ and face death. So, yeah…video and print media is highly regulated. The Internet, not so…but the powers that be are taking steps to remedy that. |
|
| SpiralOut
(@spiralout1)
1 year, 3 months ago ago
@Alex, Absolutely. It’s as if we’re inherently malleable creatures but as we evolve we are becoming more independent in our beliefs. “I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take this anymore!” |
|
| Daniel
Fuck Censorship |
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.



