What came first?
| Frälsaren
(@manimal)
1 year, 7 months ago ago
@Ray How are space and time not energy? Are they separate from the physical universe? How is conciousness not energy? And how do we know this? How do we know energy isn’t concious? How do we know that not every piece of matter is just solid concious energy? If everything is created out of conciousness, then wouldn’t conciousness be inside everything and in between and around everything? If conciousness is where everything came from, logically everything must be conciouness? I love question bombs. |
|
| Ray Butler
It is all hypothetical really. My hypothesis is that energy can be conscious but not all energy is conscious. It is the energy within us that makes us conscious. |
|
| Frälsaren
(@manimal)
1 year, 7 months ago ago
So if you’re just making beliefs, why make them limiting and complicated? There’s really nothing to base those limitations and complications on, is there? And… Why only make hypotheses when you could instead strive to see for yourself? (or do both.) |
|
| Ray Butler
Because there is no scientific way we can perceive this as fact, at least not yet. Until then I have to hypothesise an understanding of it all, I can not ignore it and I can not prove it but I have to acknowledge it. |
|
| Frälsaren
(@manimal)
1 year, 7 months ago ago
How do you know there is no scientific way to percieve it? That makes NO sense at all. Reading what other scientists say and calling it fact is EXTREMELY unscientific, the only scientific way of knowing things is to see them for yourself. Information does not teach, experience does. You’re not really searching for knowledge, that’s why you don’t see it, you’re looking for theory. Theory isn’t knowledge. Logic and theory without experience is like a house with no foundation. Actually, it’s more like the paint on the house, except there’s no house, only paint. You can’t live in a house like that. |
|
| Niko
i think matter came first. this is based on off the idea that consciousness has to be contained within a finite body. otherwise its just energy in the universe not feeling or thinking just there flowing . |
|
| Niko
like i don’t believe in a universal consciousness. theres a universal energy thats condensed into matter which then can or can not obtain consciousness. |
|
| Niko
not all matter is conscious, like a rock doesn’t see the world in anyway,so since matter is everywhere and consciousness is limited. so i think thats another reason matter was first |
|
| Ray Butler
I have never heard of a scientist saying he proved the existence of energy beings. That is because the technology currently does not exist to prove that. Imagination is a gift we can choose to see, because it is not physically real do we reject it? Do we destroy art because, other than it’s aesthetics and expression, there is no real point to it? |
|
| mitch
Matter came first. Consciousness is matter’s story. |
|
| Ray Butler
Realistically and scientifically you would have to say that matter existed before consciousness, if human consciousness is the only consciousness possible. We have not scientifically proven that other forms of consciousness actually exist. |
|
| Frälsaren
(@manimal)
1 year, 7 months ago ago
@Ray No matter what you believe came first, it’s all just a belief, there is no proof that matter existed before conciousness, there’s no proof that it has to or should either. To you, there isn’t any real proof that anything existed before you were born. Experience is the only proof there is. True perception is the only thing that lets you see the facts. Making theories is nothing but belief. A scientific theory is no more correct than a child’s fantasy. You’re assuming that big science is correct, but you have nothing to really base any of it on, other than limiting beliefs you made up. So, if you just use your senses, what came first? |
|
| Ray Butler
Manimal; if I just use my senses then I say “nothing existed before consciousness” |
|
| Dustin
(@dobbyfisher)
1 year, 7 months ago ago
“What reason I have to believe it’s faulty? Or correct? What reason do you have?” I like your description of consciousness with relation to the painting analogy. You stated, “It takes conciousness to percieve, and mind to label, a panting is just a material object. conciousness is what sees the painting (memory database/subconcious mind.)” I completely agree, but the fact that something perceives (paint, canvas) does not mean it physically creates, it only assigns a label, which is a form of intuitive creation not material creation. |
|
| CosmicLemonade
(@cosmiclemonade)
1 year, 7 months ago ago
Which came first, the phoenix or the flame? “A circle has no beginning or end.” |
|
| Jeremiah Anschau
(@reached)
1 year, 7 months ago ago
Consciousness doesn’t dictate self-awareness, and consciousness came first. I believe in intelligent design, but not as us humans created it in our own minds and scribed in our own books. I cannot remember the site off the top of my head, but it described these minor differences that if they were any different the universe couldn’t sustain life. If the charge of electrons were something like 0.0000000001 less the entire universe would be hydrogen, but if it was 0.0000000001 more the entire universe would be one huge rock and tons of other shit about the chance of amino acids being formed into living beings from lightning being so minute that it is quite literally impossible. |
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.



