Yes, you are crazy.
“i was talking figuratively”
To enhance creativity
“you contradicted yourself”
“Probably, but you’ll have to point it out, I’m a pathological hypocrite.”
“a human oxymoron is a hypocrite”
“A human oxymoron would be defined by one’s nature. Selfless ego. A hypocrite is a hypocrite.”
please elaborate and explain how the idea that “A human oxymoron would be defined by one’s nature” adds something to/is conflictual with what i said.
“because you are using psychological not psychology.”
“I don’t understand this. ”
You first said that you were not using psychology, and then you used psychology again in your reply.
That is a song I came up with I hope you all enjoy.
@ijesuschrist, dont let your dick get lost in Wonderland. It might get eaten by a oxymoronic hypocrite.
Ah, I see.
“It’s not psychology. You wrote it, I just reviewed it.” I’m assuming you consider this to be an oxymoron, or atleast hypocritical. As I’ve previously demonstrated, it can’t be an oxymoron, and while you may consider it hypocritical, I am infact making a statement, which doesn’t mean I preclude the premise of that statement. ie. you said I was psycho-analysing you, when I wasn’t. Then I started to (by your definition) psycho-analyse you, which doesn’t contradict the fact that I hadn’t been doing so previously. Is this easier to understand?
A hypocrite says one thing and does another. Selfless ego is a paradoxical concept between selflessness and selfishness – it has nothing to do with contradicting oneself via action, although I concede it could via intent. If it makes you feel better, I’ve confused myself now, which is ok I suppose since it is my concept to begin with…
I really thought you were going to go somewhere with this whole oxymoron thing…I may be sympathizing with you regarding your pessismistic view of the posts on this site now though…which is something atleast.
And I did not say you called me a pathological hypocrite, I was just making conversation – you’re mildly defensive, please don’t be …I am genuinely enjoying you.
this discussion had so much potential, now, just complete rubbish. Kind of a reflection of the idea expressed in the OP, this discussion could almost be a microcosm for HE itself. Hmm, ironic, if not just a little bit tragic.
Yes, but you can’t figure out why. That is satisfying.
Your definition of oxymoron or your “figurative” definition of oxymoron…that is less so when one considers how you lament the pseudointellectualisms running rampant on this site.
@smalls, Let’s change it, shall we? I’m gonna try.
Yes, I am crazy. I fell in love with someone over the internet and the basic reason for me to check HE is to see how like-minded people give their opinions about love, or intellect, or materialistic possessions, it is all ego. You can try to wait for someone to “make your day” with a brilliant idea or you can be that someone, just know that no one is going to benefit from what you DON’T LIKE. Check out how simple that is, no one cares what you don’t like, no one cares what are your complaints when you don’t have a better idea and no one even knows why should they care about empty complaints. That’s not CRAZY, that’s annoying. Here’s crazy.
Your arguments are getting you absolutely nowhere. Ако използвате преводача на google, ще разберете какво ви говоря. Ще е хубаво ако някой въведе на какъв език е приемливо да се общува в http://www.highexistence.com/topic/faq-how-to-use-highexistence/.
Сега ще престана да говоря на български.
You all suck. In a unique way.
@beyond, ясно е на какъв език е приемливо да се общува… обаче същественото не си го написал на български… а това “You all suck.” съм убедена, че е просто част от нашенската ти лудост…и сигурно ти е гадно, че намерих този сайт…обаче ми е интересно…sorry
@lnikolova, Същественото няма как да го напиша на български, никой няма да си направи труда. Не съществува такова нещо като “Нашенска лудост”. Няма и за какво да ми е гадно. :) Може да се опиташ и да кажеш нещо по темата.
I do kinda of agree with Seeker. C’mon people use citations to prove your credibility!
Seems to me like your undivided responses with everyone on this thread points negates the original posts objective. Some of the threads may have no substance but there is plenty of people willing and able to contribute substantial information (which most do). In that sense, you are failing to discern the competency of this community. This whole conversation is a somewhat of a oxymoron in itself.
@beyond, тема няма(поне според мен) обаче не е трудно да се забележи,че много от хората тук просто искат да се похвалят с нещо…и го правят.
@lnikolova, Има тема, теми. Let’s talk in English, no one would want to see Bulgarian language and just wonder what the fuck is going on. No one would try to search for translation when everyone is self-centered and even responds just like you do. You are full of shit and it’s obvious. “Нашенска лудост”? Please try having conversations with people that don’t speak your language. That’s why I think like that. And try to state something when you have experience. Seriously.
Actually, I can’t stand idiots anymore. If you really have something to say, try not thinking about your own environment, your own habitat?
Here’s a substance – there is no fucking way I would follow your bullshit when you, yourselves, have no fucking idea what the fuck are you talking about. You do suck.
Let’s see the next comments inspired by your own pathetic need to show how right you need to be!
Ah, fuck you. :)
@beyond, I am you and you are me.
@seeker, You must be pretty god damn miserable if you generalize about people like that and judge people for not “transcending their ego.” Get that shit out of here. I’ve had it with this site almost it’s just turning into assholes judging people because they think they’re above it all and stupid arguments like the one I’m having right now. Get fucked
you’ve acted wisely until so far because you wrote this reading freely. welcome to our group :)
#1: This is totally your opinion and I respect that. But everyone is not the same, while you see trash others may see treasures when they consider another perspective. This is a freethinking site from what I gather and it’s quite successful because people explore their “thoughts” and made it a site worth sticking around. If I find bullshit in some posts (which will happen on any forum) I wouldn’t conclude everyone on this site is crazy or would I dwell on it, I see people mentally exercising and learning from the process.
This is pretty much a place people could release their big question thoughts they have hidden, which would otherwise be shunned in real life. So this forum is a outlet to release all those odd thoughts concerning life you can finally share with people without potential troubles.
Your thread title from my perspective is saying you’re “wrong” for having thoughts and big questions concerning life. I take your thread title as a huge generalization.
#2: I don’t know what to say about your second point, but if I was in your position I wouldn’t dwell on the negative. Everything is not going to be perfect, so I wouldn’t spend potential positive constructive time in pointing out and dwelling on imperfectness. Instead I’ll take note this is bullshit and go about reading a plethora very thoughtful posts here.
I like conversation, regardless if it is of a relevent topic or not. I don’t say anything about threads that I am not interested in because I am not a pretencious git. And why should we use citations to prove our point, yes you can if you want to, but even if you do I am not going to think anything you say is anything more than opinion anyway. Because if I want to read facts I will look them up, I wont come to a site that specializes in conversations and opinions.
The contradiction of how I just sounded like a pretencious git by saying I am not a pretencious git, ha.
@stealf Yes, exactly. I was
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.